Tag Archive for L&I attorney seattle

Union Membership Continues to Decline

Union membership in Washington State and the U.S. has fallen yet another year, continuing a trend now spanning several decades. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, membership rates in 2011 fell to 11.8% of the American work force.  That figure was down slightly from 11.9% in 2010, despite the fact that total union membership rose slightly by 49,000 workers last year (membership now stands at 14.76 million). The overall membership rate declined because the uptick in organized labor’s ranks failed to keep pace with an overall growth in employment.

The bureau announced these figures as American labor unions came under increasing political attack. Republican governors and Republican-controlled legislatures in Wisconsin and elsewhere have moved to diminish public employees’ rights to collective bargaining. More recently, Indiana is moving to become the first state in over a decade to implement a “right to work” law, which bars employers and unions from entering into contracts that require workers to pay fees for union representation.

According to the BLS, unions currently represent 16.3 million workers, some 1.5 million more than the total membership, suggesting that many workers choose to refrain from joining the unions that represent them in their place of work.

The percentage of public sector workers in unions stood at 37% last year, more than five times higher than the 6.9% membership rate for private sector employees. By comparison, more than 35% of private sector workers belonged to unions in the 1950s.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics claims that the total number of private sector employees in unions rose by 110,000 to 7.2 million, aided by a partial recovery in manufacturing and construction sectors. Yet as an increasing number of states, cities and school districts lay off workers, the number of public sector employees in unions fell 61,000, to 7.56 million.

The Labor Department reported that the highest union rates were in New York State, where 24.1% of workers are members; this is followed by Alaska (22.1%) and Hawaii (21.5%). North Carolina currently has the lowest rate at a mere 2.9%, followed by South Carolina (3.4%) and Georgia (3.9%).

If you are in need of a Washington Employment Attorney, Workers Compensation Lawyer, or need experienced counsel for any part of your L&I Claim, contact Emery Reddy for help with your case.  Our team can also provide confidential legal advice and representation to workers who have been ordered to complete an independent medical examination for a workplace injury.

L&I Pushes for Better Worker Protection in Metals Industry

Two years ago a Washington state foundry worker fell into a tub of molten steel and sustained injuries that resulted in the loss of a leg and arm. Then, only a few months following this tragic incident, another Washington worker suffered severe burns at a galvanizing plant when he stepped into molten zinc. These cases, unfortunately, are only two of many incidents each year where metal workers suffer a work-related injury or occupational illness due to exposure to metal dust, fumes and other harmful substances.

In response to these workplace injuries – along with other health and safety hazards common among workers in the primary metals industry –the Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) has joined in a national campaign headed by OSHA to reduce serious injuries and enhance workplace safety across the industry. L&I officials estimate that approximately seventy businesses in Washington are in the primary metals industry.

In a statement released by the head of L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), L&I Assistant Director Michael Silverstein offered the following remarks:

“Men and women working in foundries and other jobs where metal is cast or refined face several significant hazards, including exposure to lead and dangerous chemicals, extreme noise and heat, as well as injuries from the machinery and materials being used. With this special emphasis, L&I hopes to reduce the risks these workers face.”

As part of this new worker safety initiative, L&I has created a web page specifically devoted to reducing workplace hazards in the metals industry; the page also provides training materials and other relevant resources. Washington workers and employers are encouraged to visit the site here: www.PrimaryMetals.Lni.wa.gov.

The new workplace safety campaign also includes a mailing of informational literature to nearly seventy businesses in Washington that fall within the primary metals category. For those interested in seeing images of two serious workplace injuries caused by to molten metal, L&I has also put together a slideshow (viewer discretion advised). Finally, Washington L&I plans to expand enforcement inspections throughout the state.

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) launched a nationwide program to protect metal workers last year. Officials stated that due to the hazards of this workplace, workers in the metal industry have an injury and fatality rate exceeding many other industrial jobs. This trend, unfortunately, holds true in Washington State as well.

Employers and managers who oversee worker safety are encouraged to request individualized help in addressing workplace hazards by contacting an L&I Safety and Health consultant, or by calling a local L&I office.

If you have suffered a workplace injury or have an occupational illness, contact a Seattle L&I Lawyer at Emery Reddy today for help with your L&I claim.

Broadcast version of L&I’s news release:

“The Department of Labor & Industries has joined a national effort to improve safety at smelters, foundries and other metal processing facilities that make up the state’s primary metals industry. The effort involves increased inspections, more safety and health outreach into the industry, including the development of a new L&I web page, with training materials and other information. Businesses in this industry should expect to receive a postcard in the mail announcing the effort.”

Injury Rates Improve for Washington State Workers

Survey results released by the Department of Labor & Industries show that job sites across Washington became safer in 2010, continuing a trend that started over a decade ago.  According to the Washington State Occupational Injury and Illness Survey, 5 out of every 100 full-time workers (including employees in both private and public sector industries) sustained a job-related injury or illness in 2010. This figure is down from the rate of 5.3 in 100 from 2009.

2010’s rate is the lowest recorded in Washington since 2003, when the injury rate stood at 6.9. 2003 was the year when L&I adopted the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which is also used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Within private industries themselves, Washington’s injury and illness rate is still above the average national rate. Injuries among Washington workers stood at 4.8 per 100 full-time employees in 2010, while the national rate was 3.5.

Nearly every major industry in Washington showed better numbers in 2010. Injury and illness rates among construction workers, for instance, fell from 8.2 per 100 in 2009 to 7.2 in 2010. Nursing and Residential Care Facilities experienced a decline of 11.4 injuries per 100 workers in 2009 to 9.4 injuries last year.

Another significant change in this latest survey was the occurrence of “serious injuries” – injuries severe enough to prevent a worker from performing their usual job duties. In 2010, half of workers who were injured or became ill were in need of time off or modified work duties during recovery. That rate represented a drop of a few percentage points from the 2009 rate.

If you have been injured at work or have developed a work-related illness and need help with your L&I Claim, contact a Washington Workers Compensation Lawyer for assistance with your case. Our attorneys also provide confidential legal advice and professional observers to accompany workers during the independent medical examination process.

 

 

Labor Dept Makes Changes to Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act

The Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs at the U.S. Department of Labor just issued its final ruling to implement an exclusion for recreational vessel workers under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. The rule sets guidelines for what constitutes a “recreational vessel” under the exclusion.

The LHWCA provides compensation to workers (or surviving family members, in cases of death) for on-the-job injuries that occur during maritime employment on U.S. navigable waters. Before 2009, employees who performed repair or dismantling work on recreational vessels less than 65 feet long were not eligible for benefits through LHWCA if they were already covered by a state workers’ compensation program. The 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act extended this exclusion by removing the 65-foot restriction; following the amendment, workers who repair recreational vessels of any length, or who dismantle vessels for repair, are excluded from LHWCA coverage if they have coverage under a state workers’ compensation system.

This rule follows a number of recommendations put forward by the public during open comment sessions on the proposed rule from Aug. 17, 2010. The final rule adopts standards set by the U.S. Coast Guard to define a recreational vessel. The Labor Department has also tacked on two additional provisions to simplify the process of applying these standards in the LHWCA context:

  1. A manufacturer or builder can make determinations about whether vessels are recreational under the meaning of the regulation based on that vessel’s design, rather than on its ultimate use.
  2. Noncommercial vessels with a recreational “design” that are owned or chartered by federal or state governments will be defined as recreational vessels.

The rule is described in detail at the Federal Register’s website: http://federalregister.gov/a/2011-32880. Additional information is available on OWCP’s website at http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/lsnewregulation.htm.

The Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs administers several disability benefit programs that cover longshore and harbor workers, federal government civilian contractors who work overseas, coal miners, federal employees and nuclear weapons workers. These programs provide a variety of benefits, including income replacement, medical benefits, vocational rehabilitation and survivor benefits. For more information about these programs, visit http://www.dol.gov/owcp.

If you have sustained an injury at work, we encourage you to contact a Washington Workers Compensation Attorney for help with your claim.

What is an Independent Medical Exam?

Employees suffering from a work-related injury, disability or illness are often required to have an Independent Medical Exam (or IME).

 What is an Independent Medical Exam?

 If you become injured or disabled at work and have an open L&I claim, the Department of Labor and Industries may require you to submit to an Independent Medical Exam. Many workers believe that the exam is impartial owing to the word “independent” in the name of this procedure. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. In fact, some workers’ advocates claim that “it would be a lot more accurate to call the exam an Insurance Medical Exam because it is done by, for, and to benefit the insurance company. Unfortunately, insurance carriers are not looking for an independent evaluation.”

This is not exactly correct in all cases, but there is a certain kernel of truth to the charge. Most “Independent” Medical Exams are performed by doctors (or other medical professionals) who depend on the IME for a substantial part of their income. IME physicians understand that the Department of Labor and Industries has no overwhelming incentive to find you injured or disabled.

In any case, the general sentiment that Independent Medical Exam physicians are biased in favor of L&I is prevalent enough that many IME groups address the stereotype head-on.  One Independent Medical Exam website offers the following disclaimer that “While we can’t answer for physicians elsewhere, our physicians are all board-certified, in private practice with injured patients of their own to care for. They are not ‘paid by the State’ (or anyone else), but by us. We allow no pressure of any kind to be brought to bear on our specialists, either by referral sources, or, for that matter, by anyone else. Our physicians have no incentive to offer a biased opinion; financial or otherwise, nor will we permit any attempt to influence their best medical judgment. Their financial relationship is with us, not the referral source; they have no reason to “please” the referral as they have no financial contact with the referral source. We see our primary task as providing an influence-free environment for every evaluation.”

Furthermore the IME source claims that “Our physicians will be responding to questions provided by the referral source; however, this does not mean that the interests of the referral source will prevail or drive their conclusions in any manner. The sole purpose is to provide a current, thorough, medical evaluation of your injury or condition, without influence of any kind.”  Such defenses are commonly heard when concerns are raised about the impartiality of the Independent Medical Exam process, although such claims themselves are not usually supported with evidence that convinces critics of the IME system.

An L&I Washington Law Firm raises the following doubts about such statements of defense: “Most medical professionals who perform IME’s for insurance carriers usually do so on a regular basis either in a direct relationship with the carrier or with a third-party IME service, and this gives them a vested interest in finding disabled claimants healthy and able-bodied – they consider it job security. These medical professionals seek to tell the insurance carriers (their customers) what the insurance carriers want to hear, i.e., that the patient is medically fine and not entitled to disability benefits. They know that if they perform an independent examination and find the claimant to be disabled, it will lead to less repeat business from the insurance carrier, or carriers. In the end, the IME doctor most often chooses to keep his or her customer happy by giving them what they want – a medical report which supports denying the claim.”

What happens at an Independent Medical Evaluation?

The IME usually begins with a record review. Before patients even meet the IME doctor, Labor & Industries staff who are reviewing your L&I claim have already scrutinized your medical records, and may provide only selective records to the IME doctor for review. Records that have been taken out of context can create the appearance that your medical condition isn’t as serious as it might be, or that medical evidence is contradictory or ambiguous.  As a result, even if an IME doctor would otherwise be inclined towards impartiality, he or she is only provided with pre-screened information.

Another fairly common practice among some IME doctors is to look for “holes” in your medical record. Something as simple as an accidental omission on the part of your treating physician can result in an IME doctor deciding that your medical report does not support your disability claim.

Many patients report that even when the exam finally occurs, it can seem rather superficial. IMEs often last only a few minutes – which many find surprising given the extensiveness of an IME doctor’s report and the long list of clinical testing the doctor supposedly performed.  If you have been scheduled for an Independent Medical Exam, don’t expect a thorough exam.


Other Problems with the IME

Another problem with the system is that many IME professionals have preconceptions about certain medical conditions common among workers with disabilities and injuries. Some IME doctors entirely dismiss debilitating conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia because these illnesses are difficult to detect through CT-scans, MRIs and other diagnostic procedures. This is unsurprising when you consider that most IME doctors spend much of their time performing IMEs. Unlike primary physicians (your own doctor), who generally examine and treat patients over extended lengths of time, doctors specializing in Independent Medical Exams basically see a mere snapshot of the patient’s medical condition. This means an IME doctor can only assess the claimant’s condition for that single medical visit required by the Department of Labor and Industries.

The fact is that many occupational illnesses or medical conditions can only be diagnosed over long periods of time involving many clinical visits that track developments in a patient’s symptoms and test results. Given their highly restricted interaction with the patient (along with their general bias), it is expectable that so many IME doctors doubt the injured worker’s condition and disregard reported symptoms like headaches, dizziness, pain or numbness.

Is the Independent Medical Exam Required?
Employees with an L&I claim cannot refuse an Independent Medical Exam. If they do, it is likely that the Department of Labor and Industries will automatically reject your L&I claim or terminate your benefits. However, workers can minimize negative consequences from this procedure with the help of a knowledgeable L&I attorney. Emery Reddy counsels clients in advance of the Independent Medical Exam.  We can also send a trained professional to accompany you to your medical examination. This sends a clear message to the independent medical professional that a law firm is paying attention to their assessment.  In observing everything that happens during the IME, the professional will also report to an Emery Reddy attorney, and determine whether the IME doctor completed the clinical tests he or she claims to have performed.

When applying for benefits in an L&I claim, Independent Medical Exams can be an unfortunate and unavoidable fact. But this doesn’t mean you must become a victim. Contact Emery Reddy for a free case evaluation and assistance with your L&I claim.