Tag Archive for injury attorney

Labor & Industries Medical Provider Network Now Accepting Applications

 Washington’s Department of Labor & Industries has now begun to accept applications for the state workers’ compensation medical network, which will launch in 2013. Network providers will give medical care to injured workers covered by L&I policies as well as those with self-insured employers.

Starting in January of 2013, certain providers that practice medicine in Washington state will be required to participate in the network in order to treat injured workers beyond the initial emergency-room or office visit. This will include L&I doctors, chiropractors, naturopathic physicians, registered nurse practitioners, physician assistants, dentists, and optometrists.

Beth Dupre, Assistant Director for Insurance Services, explained that L&I “wants every great health-care provider in the state to be part of our network. Your patients are counting on your participation. I urge you to apply early, so we can have credentialing completed before the network launches.”

Standards and guidelines for joining the network are detailed in the new L&I rules, which became effective on February 3, 2012.

Providers have the option of applying at www.JoinTheNetwork.Lni.wa.gov. Over the coming year, L&I plans to reach out to current L&I providers and encourage them to apply. New providers can apply to the network at any time.

Providers currently treating patients with L&I claims must re-apply; this includes health professionals already participating in the Centers for Occupational Health and Education (COHE).

Different kinds of medical providers (including out-of-state providers) will be able to continue treating injured workers with an L&I Claim until they are contacted about joining the network at a later date.

After the network officially begins to operate, injured workers will have the option of seeing non-network providers, but only for their initial visit. After this, the injured worker must select a network provider for subsequent care. An L&I Attorney can help workers locate a network provider.

Workers having trouble collecting injury benefits from L&I are encouraged to contact a Seattle Workers Compensation Attorney.  We can also provide you with crucial advice if the Department of Labor and Industries has required you to complete an Independent Medical Examination.

Dead Doctor Dilemma Resolved by Workers’ Compensation Commission

Two weeks ago we reported the story of Arkansas worker Lauren Eason, who was denied a change of physician even though her doctor had died in December. Eason had already switched physicians earlier in the year, and Arkansas law does not allow patients with a workers compensation injury to change a second time. Therefore, after her newer doctor passed away, the Arkansas Workers Compensation Commission ruled that she would have to stick with that physician regardless of the bizarre circumstances.

This was yet another unfortunate case of unintended consequences: a law designed to restrict excessive “doctor shopping” had ensnared an unsuspecting worker with a legitimate injury and a legitimate cause for requesting a second transfer of care.

Originally, Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission CEO Alan McClain stated that administrative solutions were available for the worker, but projected that it could take 3 to 6 months to resolve the issue.

The case generated some heated discussion on the LinkedIn group Workers’ Compensation Roundtable. McClain responded to critics on the site to further clarify the issue and exonerate his agency. He wrote that the law may have prevented the Workers Compensation board from selecting an alternate physician, but “as long as the employer has not denied medical benefits then the injured employee is entitled to medical care, arranged and paid for by the employer/carrier, regardless of the agency’s administrative ability to select a treating physician.” While the meaning here was not entirely clear, McClain seemed to be suggesting that this law was not an obstacle for an uncontested claim. Some commentators speculated that there were additional circumstances affecting Eason’s injury claim since the denial from the state was so emphatic.

Nonetheless, the Arkansas WCC has followed up on the controversy with an advisory that covers the initial issue. On Monday, they issued AWCC ADVISORY 2012-1, which states:

“When the physician named in a Change of Physician Order by the AWCC has passed away while actively treating the claimant for a compensable injury (or prior to releasing the claimant from treatment) or is known to the Commission to no longer be in practice without having made adequate provisions for the continued treatment of the claimant’s compensable injury, the Change of Physician Order shall become null and void and shall no longer be considered the claimant’s one time change of physician.”

Such a case has yet to arise within Washington’s department of labor and industries; yet while it is unlikely that most injured workers will find themselves in such extraordinary circumstances, many do face insufficient injury benefits or medical coverage, a denied L&I claim, a requirement to undergo an independent medical examination, or simply need help navigating the complexities of their L&I claim. If you need assistance with any issue related to workers compensation benefits or your negotiations with the department labor and industries more generally, contact an L&I lawyer or Seattle Employment attorney today.

L&I Pushes for Better Worker Protection in Metals Industry

Two years ago a Washington state foundry worker fell into a tub of molten steel and sustained injuries that resulted in the loss of a leg and arm. Then, only a few months following this tragic incident, another Washington worker suffered severe burns at a galvanizing plant when he stepped into molten zinc. These cases, unfortunately, are only two of many incidents each year where metal workers suffer a work-related injury or occupational illness due to exposure to metal dust, fumes and other harmful substances.

In response to these workplace injuries – along with other health and safety hazards common among workers in the primary metals industry –the Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) has joined in a national campaign headed by OSHA to reduce serious injuries and enhance workplace safety across the industry. L&I officials estimate that approximately seventy businesses in Washington are in the primary metals industry.

In a statement released by the head of L&I’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), L&I Assistant Director Michael Silverstein offered the following remarks:

“Men and women working in foundries and other jobs where metal is cast or refined face several significant hazards, including exposure to lead and dangerous chemicals, extreme noise and heat, as well as injuries from the machinery and materials being used. With this special emphasis, L&I hopes to reduce the risks these workers face.”

As part of this new worker safety initiative, L&I has created a web page specifically devoted to reducing workplace hazards in the metals industry; the page also provides training materials and other relevant resources. Washington workers and employers are encouraged to visit the site here: www.PrimaryMetals.Lni.wa.gov.

The new workplace safety campaign also includes a mailing of informational literature to nearly seventy businesses in Washington that fall within the primary metals category. For those interested in seeing images of two serious workplace injuries caused by to molten metal, L&I has also put together a slideshow (viewer discretion advised). Finally, Washington L&I plans to expand enforcement inspections throughout the state.

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) launched a nationwide program to protect metal workers last year. Officials stated that due to the hazards of this workplace, workers in the metal industry have an injury and fatality rate exceeding many other industrial jobs. This trend, unfortunately, holds true in Washington State as well.

Employers and managers who oversee worker safety are encouraged to request individualized help in addressing workplace hazards by contacting an L&I Safety and Health consultant, or by calling a local L&I office.

If you have suffered a workplace injury or have an occupational illness, contact a Seattle L&I Lawyer at Emery Reddy today for help with your L&I claim.

Broadcast version of L&I’s news release:

“The Department of Labor & Industries has joined a national effort to improve safety at smelters, foundries and other metal processing facilities that make up the state’s primary metals industry. The effort involves increased inspections, more safety and health outreach into the industry, including the development of a new L&I web page, with training materials and other information. Businesses in this industry should expect to receive a postcard in the mail announcing the effort.”

As Snow Storm Hits Washington, Workers Take Precautions

With weather forecasters predicting one of the biggest Seattle snow storms in recent years to arrive tomorrow, workers and employers should prepare to take full precautions to ensure winter safety. The U.S. Department of Labor has created a new page on the website for its Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to help protect workers from potential hazards that come with winter storm response and recovery operations.

Visit OSHA’s Winter Storms Web page.

During winter months, employees who work in snow storms experience increased rates of injuries, as shown by increased L&I claims during these extreme conditions. OSHA’s new online tool offers tips and guidelines for how Washington employers and workers engaged in clean-up and recovery operations can identify hazards inherent in snow storm conditions, and take necessary steps to ensure worker safety while carrying out their jobs in wintry conditions. The webpage includes best practices and directions for workers whose activities may lead them to clear heavy snow around workplaces or from rooftops; encounter downed power lines; travel on slick or icy roads; or restore power after storms.

Hazards related to work in winter storm conditions include:

  • Workers being struck by falling objects (icicles, tree limbs, utility poles, etc)
  • Vehicle accidents on icy roadways
  • Carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Dehydration, hypothermia or frostbite
  • Exhaustion from overexertion
  • Back injuries – or even heart attacks – while removing snow
  • Slips & falls on slippery walkways
  • Electrocution from downed power lines and objects in contact with them
  • Burns from fires caused by energized line contact or equipment failure
  • Falls from rooftop snow removal, or while working on aerial lifts or ladders
  • Roof collapse under excess snow weight
  • Injuries from improperly operated chain saws and power tools, or from improperly attempting to clear jams in snow blowers

In response to these winter hazards and the work-related injuries that often occur in such condition, OSHA details the most effective measures for minimizing winter storm hazards. These include:

  • Approaching all power lines as if they were energized, and staying completely clear of downed or damaged power lines
  • Ensuring all powered equipment is properly guarded and disconnected from power sources before cleaning or performing maintenance
  • Using extremely caution on and around surfaces that are weighed down by snow or ice
  • Shoveling only moderate to small amounts of snow at a time, and using appropriate lifting form to avoid back injuries
  • Keeping walking surfaces clear of snow and ice; use salt where appropriate
  • Employers should provide and ensure the use of fall protection measures, and maintain ladders in good working condition
  • Remaining in one’s vehicle in the case of roadway emergency. Occupants should not leave a vehicle unless help is visible within 100 yards
  • Wearing reflective uniforms or clothing, as well as face and body protection
  • Clearly marking work zones
  • Using engineering controls, personal protective equipment and safe work practices to minimize the length of exposure to cold.

The new Winter Storms Web page provides links to OSHA guidelines, as well as advice from Federal Emergency Management Agency, the American Red Cross, the National Weather Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Safety Council and other relevant organizations.

As OSHA explains on its website: “Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to ensure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.”

What is an Independent Medical Exam?

Employees suffering from a work-related injury, disability or illness are often required to have an Independent Medical Exam (or IME).

 What is an Independent Medical Exam?

 If you become injured or disabled at work and have an open L&I claim, the Department of Labor and Industries may require you to submit to an Independent Medical Exam. Many workers believe that the exam is impartial owing to the word “independent” in the name of this procedure. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. In fact, some workers’ advocates claim that “it would be a lot more accurate to call the exam an Insurance Medical Exam because it is done by, for, and to benefit the insurance company. Unfortunately, insurance carriers are not looking for an independent evaluation.”

This is not exactly correct in all cases, but there is a certain kernel of truth to the charge. Most “Independent” Medical Exams are performed by doctors (or other medical professionals) who depend on the IME for a substantial part of their income. IME physicians understand that the Department of Labor and Industries has no overwhelming incentive to find you injured or disabled.

In any case, the general sentiment that Independent Medical Exam physicians are biased in favor of L&I is prevalent enough that many IME groups address the stereotype head-on.  One Independent Medical Exam website offers the following disclaimer that “While we can’t answer for physicians elsewhere, our physicians are all board-certified, in private practice with injured patients of their own to care for. They are not ‘paid by the State’ (or anyone else), but by us. We allow no pressure of any kind to be brought to bear on our specialists, either by referral sources, or, for that matter, by anyone else. Our physicians have no incentive to offer a biased opinion; financial or otherwise, nor will we permit any attempt to influence their best medical judgment. Their financial relationship is with us, not the referral source; they have no reason to “please” the referral as they have no financial contact with the referral source. We see our primary task as providing an influence-free environment for every evaluation.”

Furthermore the IME source claims that “Our physicians will be responding to questions provided by the referral source; however, this does not mean that the interests of the referral source will prevail or drive their conclusions in any manner. The sole purpose is to provide a current, thorough, medical evaluation of your injury or condition, without influence of any kind.”  Such defenses are commonly heard when concerns are raised about the impartiality of the Independent Medical Exam process, although such claims themselves are not usually supported with evidence that convinces critics of the IME system.

An L&I Washington Law Firm raises the following doubts about such statements of defense: “Most medical professionals who perform IME’s for insurance carriers usually do so on a regular basis either in a direct relationship with the carrier or with a third-party IME service, and this gives them a vested interest in finding disabled claimants healthy and able-bodied – they consider it job security. These medical professionals seek to tell the insurance carriers (their customers) what the insurance carriers want to hear, i.e., that the patient is medically fine and not entitled to disability benefits. They know that if they perform an independent examination and find the claimant to be disabled, it will lead to less repeat business from the insurance carrier, or carriers. In the end, the IME doctor most often chooses to keep his or her customer happy by giving them what they want – a medical report which supports denying the claim.”

What happens at an Independent Medical Evaluation?

The IME usually begins with a record review. Before patients even meet the IME doctor, Labor & Industries staff who are reviewing your L&I claim have already scrutinized your medical records, and may provide only selective records to the IME doctor for review. Records that have been taken out of context can create the appearance that your medical condition isn’t as serious as it might be, or that medical evidence is contradictory or ambiguous.  As a result, even if an IME doctor would otherwise be inclined towards impartiality, he or she is only provided with pre-screened information.

Another fairly common practice among some IME doctors is to look for “holes” in your medical record. Something as simple as an accidental omission on the part of your treating physician can result in an IME doctor deciding that your medical report does not support your disability claim.

Many patients report that even when the exam finally occurs, it can seem rather superficial. IMEs often last only a few minutes – which many find surprising given the extensiveness of an IME doctor’s report and the long list of clinical testing the doctor supposedly performed.  If you have been scheduled for an Independent Medical Exam, don’t expect a thorough exam.


Other Problems with the IME

Another problem with the system is that many IME professionals have preconceptions about certain medical conditions common among workers with disabilities and injuries. Some IME doctors entirely dismiss debilitating conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia because these illnesses are difficult to detect through CT-scans, MRIs and other diagnostic procedures. This is unsurprising when you consider that most IME doctors spend much of their time performing IMEs. Unlike primary physicians (your own doctor), who generally examine and treat patients over extended lengths of time, doctors specializing in Independent Medical Exams basically see a mere snapshot of the patient’s medical condition. This means an IME doctor can only assess the claimant’s condition for that single medical visit required by the Department of Labor and Industries.

The fact is that many occupational illnesses or medical conditions can only be diagnosed over long periods of time involving many clinical visits that track developments in a patient’s symptoms and test results. Given their highly restricted interaction with the patient (along with their general bias), it is expectable that so many IME doctors doubt the injured worker’s condition and disregard reported symptoms like headaches, dizziness, pain or numbness.

Is the Independent Medical Exam Required?
Employees with an L&I claim cannot refuse an Independent Medical Exam. If they do, it is likely that the Department of Labor and Industries will automatically reject your L&I claim or terminate your benefits. However, workers can minimize negative consequences from this procedure with the help of a knowledgeable L&I attorney. Emery Reddy counsels clients in advance of the Independent Medical Exam.  We can also send a trained professional to accompany you to your medical examination. This sends a clear message to the independent medical professional that a law firm is paying attention to their assessment.  In observing everything that happens during the IME, the professional will also report to an Emery Reddy attorney, and determine whether the IME doctor completed the clinical tests he or she claims to have performed.

When applying for benefits in an L&I claim, Independent Medical Exams can be an unfortunate and unavoidable fact. But this doesn’t mean you must become a victim. Contact Emery Reddy for a free case evaluation and assistance with your L&I claim.